Most people struggle to tell real faces from computer-generated ones. However, a British Journal of Psychology study provides evidence that highly skilled face recognizers have a slight advantage ...

As game developers continue to argue about the value of generative AI tools, some genAI inventors are trying to claim for ...

The high court declined to decide whether an artificial intelligence machine could author a work under copyright law.

Do AI-generated works enjoy copyright protection? The US Copyright Office is adamant they do not under current American law and that position has been endorsed by various courts. The Supreme Court has ...

Anthropic announced its acquisition of Vercept this week, in a move that signals the company’s intent to move further into ...

How much artificial intelligence can a human use and still call a piece of work — whether it’s art, a book or music — their own? The answer has profound implications for American intellectual property ...

A visual artwork created by AI technology receives no copyright protection in the USA because the work lacks a human creator.

Welcome to the “Tillyverse” — the digital world of controversial AI "actress" Tilly Norwood. Its creator says it will allow AI characters to collaborate and build artificial acting careers. How ...

People with stronger object recognition skills are better at spotting AI-generated faces, according to new research. Intelligence and AI familiarity did not predict performance.

Plaintiff Stephen Thaler had appealed after lower courts upheld a U.S. Copyright Office decision that the AI-crafted visual ⁠art ‌was ineligible for copyright.

U.S. justices leave human authorship rule intact, reinforcing legal limits on AI intellectual property claims.

Have AI agents like Moltbot fundamentally changed whether we need a computer for work? What does this mean for business?